 |
| Obama voter seen before casting a ballot |
Utterly amazing that after seeing the last dismal 4 years dragging by, so many Americans who have been watching our rights, jobs, economy and, our money swirling the bowl would press the flush handle again in order to finish the job.
Freedom has taken a backseat to freebies and the American media has cloaked the truth and, conditioned people to embrace free-dumb and accept the idea of only being told what they hope to hear as opposed to the truth.
So, I 'm...a minority now, that part of America who is still content with working and living as privately as possible with little intrusion in our lives from a limited government that respects the laws that bind it as subordinate to the people as it was designed to be...and not the other way around.
Since only about 52% of eligible voters decided it was worth getting off their asses and being heard, shame on those folks who claim to value our constitution and God-given rights that didn't bother to defend them in their hour of need.
As far as I'm concerned, those folks have ceded their right to complain when the next four years ebb away even more liberties.
At Obama's current spending level, we're projected to hit the 22 trillion dollar mark before his new term is over. And, he's not indicated that he plans on stopping or, even slowing down.
We're going to be stuck with unrepayable debt, a military that is being used as a social experiment, higher food, gas, fuel, electricity and clothing costs and, increased joblessness and welfare cases.
How can I make that claim?
Easy, I have four years of history to look at and, the same plan is in place as before...in Obama's words, he wants to "finish what he's started".
Yeah, he'll finish us alright.
The America as designed will cease to exist.
The America of the future will likely be a heavily medicated, highly taxed, buried in debt 3rd world police state in comparison.
But,
If anyone needs any oil, head to the graves of our founders since I'm sure they're spinning in them so much that they're bound to strike oil soon.
This election proved that not only can the blind lead the blind but, the stupid will willingly jump into line follow them too.
God bless America...we're gonna need it.
22 comments:
I'm smarter than anybody else. You can tell it by the way I talk and the way I live. Here is what is going to happen:
-"Get ready for God’s wrath. The people are chosing Satan’s finest, and God’s going to give them what they voted for."
-"God’s wrath is already here. Obama is our punishment. America in the next four years is going to be destroyed."
-"This is worse than Obama winning. Our country embraces evil."
-"The battle of Gog and Magog is near. Ezekiel chapters 37-39 covers all this."
-"Disgusting! What’s next, now are we discriminating against polygamists, pedophiles, beastialitites, or people that just want to assign their stuff to each other to avoid taxation and get a grab on benefits that were reserved for children of what used to be called normal families? SICK SICK SICK!!! What a filthy night this election is."
-"It seems like overnight, we fell off the knife edge, on the communist side, and now every strand of moral fabric in this country is falling apart!"
-"Expect a gargantuan push to counterfeit marriage in Minnesota now, either through an eventual Demonicrat legislature, or from a dictatorial court."
Actually alpha-bat, I'm pretty sure the voters ARE going to get what they voted for.
It may not be what they thought they were getting and, it may not be to their liking but, they'll get it.
As opposed to trying to be a wise-ass, perhaps you can enlighten us non-leftnuts as to how that projected 22 trillion debt is going to be helpfull to everyone?
I'm also curious as to why mining and retrieving our own resources and employing Americans to do it is so much worse than handing tax money to South American companies so we can "be their best cusomers" as Obama put it.
Seen the world markets today? Dropping like a brick everywhere...except for China of course who stands to win big over the next 4 years.
Ya think that uncertainty might also effect somthing kind of minor to liberals...like job growth?
It seems the business world...you know...those folks who build economies...aren't to comfy with 4 more years of uncertainty due to never knowing what crap will fall out of the whitehouse next...just like the last 4 years of stagnation.
So, what exactly did you vote for?
Will we ever learn if you're really that lame or are just jerking our chain with some of the stuff you spout?
Maybe you could spend some of your downtime learning how the Federal Government works. You could learn the difference between the House and Senate. You could learn what a deficit is.
I'll even give you a challange. Write a post on the difference between Fascism, Theocracy and Democracy.You have espoused all three types on this blog.
Judging from your responses, there is ton of information that learning might make you a better person and a more informed voter.
Just sayin.....
Will we ever learn if you can answer a question asked of you?
I'll give YOU a challenge, start your own blog and get the answers you want via that avenue.
I don't take assignments but, if you had your own blog I might be willing to answer your posts.
And I don't need a lecture on "being a better person" from you.
I do just fine already.
Perhaps you should take a citizenship course or, study the constitution a little bit more and get back to me...because judging from YOUR responses, the constitution...you know, the law of our land...is a completely foreign concept to you.
Perhaps if you knew it and understood it, you might also appreciate it and protect it.
As an Obamaphile, I'm sure you only see it as an obstical.
STOP CONFUSING THE LIES WITH FACTS!!!
What you just said is that it's your blog and you'll pass along falsehoods if you want. You claim such patriotism, but then act out in the opposite direction claiming "The Constitution."
"IF" you actually have ever read the Constitution, I doubt you understand it.
The VERY first thing you have already stated is the Constitution is not meant to change. When it was pointed out to you the the first 10 amendments were changes made right at the beginning, you claim they were just part of the original document. When I countered that in the main body of the Constitution there are provisions for change, you deny they exist. When I ask about the other amendments, you claim several different reasons they exist.
You have been caught over and over again lying on this blog and other blogs.
If you're gonna post lies in public, this blog, then claim you accept all replies, then I'm gonna call you on it!
But I do thank you for allowing me to point out the misinformation that was floating around before the election. Maybe the did change some votes.
Sepp said: "What happened to General Hamm?
Don't know who0 he is?
He WAS the General in charge of Africom who decided to disobey OBAMA'S orders and rescue the diplomat anyways....And, was promply relieved of command under orders of his deputy commander."
All indications are that he's, now let me quote right off the official website of Africom:
"General Carter F. Ham
Commander, United States Africa Command"
That was taken off their website just now. Has anybody told them yet the General Ham isn't in charge anymore? Uh-oh, somebody's fibbin'!
Hello Sepp, the one thing this Presidential campaign proved to me, is that negative campaigning and political smoke screens still work.
Don't vote for me because I'm the better candidate, vote for me because I'm not as bad as that guy. What can you say, it works.
"I'm also curious as to why mining and retrieving our own resources and employing Americans to do it is so much worse than handing tax money to South American companies so we can "be their best customers" as Obama put it."
Sepp, I hope you don't mind, but I'd like to answer this question because I made a comment to Alph about it in a previous post.
I assume you are talking about the Keystone Pipeline. I do not agree with it on a couple points.
First, the oil we abstract will not be able to be refined for gasoline. Shale oil or something, I don't remember. I've been told that 95% of it will be exported, we won't even use it here. Most likely recipient would be China. Now, we could sell that oil to them to pay down our massive debt to them, but then you are making rough necks into Government employees and I don't think we need any more of those.
Second, the unemployment factors. I've heard estimates as high as 15,000 jobs created, maybe even more. But these will be temporary construction jobs. When the pipeline is completed, we would be lucky to see 1000 permanent jobs.
"The VERY first thing you have already stated is the Constitution is not meant to change."
Since I've NEVER said that, I'll chalk it up to your reading disorder alpha-bat.
You seem to be a pro at skimming a post, rearranging the words in your head and, arriving at a conclusion that has nothing to do with the actual posting or, was never stated in the first place....then, bawl that a lie was being told after making it obvious you didn't understand what you'd read.
Typical moonbat...anything you don't want to hear or, can't reference from another moonbat, you simply stick your head in the sand and pretend it isn't true.
Johnny, whenever there is a large construction project like Keystone, there are spur jobs created on top of just the folks doing the construction which alone is supposed to account for 20,000 jobs that will last about 4 - 5 years.
Then add in manufacturing of the pipe, the tooling, transportation, lodging, resturants and entertainment that crop up along the route, engineers, electricians, pipefitters, carpenters, laborrers, millrights, ironworkers, heavy machinery operators, linemen, utility workers, the list goes on and on as to how many and which types of different employees and businesses crop up and, even though some may be only for the next 5 years, it would certainly be a boost not only to our economy but, provide some needed jobs to a lot of folks who needed them 4 years ago.
As for the oil's uses, it can be burned in place of coal or, refined into diesel, kerosene or, home heating oil along with other uses.
Knocking down the price of diesel and, heating oil would be a huge benefit to our economy since EVERYTHING you buy or, eat was first harvested by diesel engined equipment then transported someplace or, many places via a diesel engine to get it to the market for you to buy it.
One of the biggest costs right now is $4+ per gallon diesel which is passed to us consumers.
Adding 20,000+ jobs and pushing the price of diesel downwards would be a huge step in moving our economy in the right direction when we need it most.
And if we end up exporting much of it, we still come out ahead.
BTW Johnny O, I agree with you 100% about the smoke-screening, deceptions and other bullshit that was played out during this election.
Obama has been a shitbag president of epic proportions.
Maybe Romney would have been worse or, just as bad...and HIS ass would have to be kicked to the curb too.
Instead, we reelected a known failure who often seems to fail by design.
If America fails under Obama, Obama sees it as a victory against the country that he's always seemed to hate anyways.
So in HIS mind ( and in our enemie's minds ), he's succeeeding.
As to the uses for the oil Sepp, I'll check that out with the resident PhD Engineer in the family LOLOLOLOLO. That's where I got my info on the oil.
As far as the jobs, I hope your right. I am definitely not against American jobs.
"Then add in manufacturing of the pipe..."
Really? Do just a minimual amount of research and you'll see the pipe currently being used on the project is 100% imported.
Wait, there's more:
eystone XL is an export pipeline.According to presentations to investors, Gulf Coast refiners plan to refine the cheap Canadian crude supplied by the pipeline into diesel and other products for export to Europe and Latin America. Proceeds from these exports are earned tax-free. Much of the fuel refined from the pipeline’s heavy crude oil will never reach U.S. drivers’ tanks.
Did I stay on topic enough for you?
Well, Alph, I'd kind of like to see where you got your "imported pipe" and other info.
Yeah, good job staying on topic...I'll print the page and, stick it on the fridge for you!
Here's a story from Fox News:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/01/18/six-reasons-keystone-xl-was-bad-deal-all-along/
AND......They can't build the pipeline to the Pacific Coast because of Canada's own environmental laws won't allow it.
And then there's that pesky question of who really owns the company building the pipeline; seems there's a lot of foreign investiment from a certain country who expects to benefit for the pipeline (HINT: It's not the U.S.). If anyone is really interested in the truth, google it yourself because Sepp will just deny anything I post*.
* Just like he did when discussing the Fast & Furious issue.
I encourage you to do your own homework and add rebuttal...thats the whole point of communicating these issues.
Just like Fast and furious?
You mean that thing on the Mexican border that you denied had even happened?
They aren't investigating F&F because it didn't happen and, the Obama administration isn't stonewalling it because they weren't involved.
BTW Alph, bawling " yer lying! yer lying!"
Isn't rebuttal...it's denial.
note: the website, The Daily Caller, whose writers ALL predicted a GOP landslide, today posted an inflammatory article titled, White House Website Deluged with Secession Petitions from 20 States
http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/11/white-house-website-deluged-with-secession-petitions-from-19-states/
(Further note- notice that 20 is in the article headline, but 19 is in the link.)
"BTW Alph, bawling " yer lying! yer lying!"
Isn't rebuttal...it's denial."
Would you mind if at a future date I posted a list of lies that have been posted here by you? It probably won't be "on topic" by then, but can I have your permission to post it and your promise not to delete it?
I don't buy into the idea that 20 "states" want secession. Maybe 20 people in 20 different states do but, I doubt the union is about to fall apart just yet.
"You mean that thing on the Mexican border that you denied had even happened?"
Never denied, but suggested it was group of cowboys in a field office. And I also pointed out that this was the THIRD time this operation was implemented in 10 years, not the first or one and only time.
Actually, you did flatly deny it and, stated that the source I'd posted "wasn't credible".
Then, when you could no longer deny it, you tried to say that F&F was actually operation wide receiver which was ended...and didn't result in a bloodbath.
Obama doesent seem to know very much that goes on under his watch does he?
Mexican gun running, drug deals made with cartels, CIA director with a mistress who has classified information stashed in her home, diplomats denied help while under attack, Arab prisoners being kept in the Libyan CIA annex...
A lot of "What did he know and, when did he know it" questions floating around these days!
Post a Comment