A nice cut and paste job from a clown who when I'd first posted word about operation F&F, was blatantly calling the entire story a "lie" because it was first reported by a news source he didn't personally like.
Here we are much later and, all those "lies" the alpha-bat poster claimed had never happened, obviously did happen and, the fool feels the need to try and vindicate his nutty cries that the story was "all lies" by posting that Eric Holder was ignorant of what goes on in his department by a direct reporting employee under him...meanwhile the story was true.
Then again, one would have to ask why Mr Holder stonewalled the investigation to the best of his ability and, the "transparent" president cloaked all references to the issue behind executive privilege...because everyone who knows nothing about something would deny facts to surface right?
Because people who have no knowledge of something always need to conceal those things they supposedly know nothing about!
Then again, how would a person know what to conceal if they didn't know what they were supposed to conceal because they didn't know about it?
"I don't know what I'm supposed to be hiding because I know nothing about it so, I'll just happen to conceal these random things that the investigation wants to see...as if it's a complete coincidence that I have things to hide that I'm unaware of!
Only an Obamaphile moonbat would buy off on that "logic".
"The OIG investigation found that Attorney General Eric Holder was not aware of the strategy and tactics used in "Fast and Furious," and turned up no evidence that Holder or other top DOJ officials tried to cover up the operation, or mislead Congress about it."
Not aware of what his direct report was doing?
Didn't try to mislead congress?
Then why all the stonewalling, lies and cover-ups?
The guy was on tape admitting that he knew about the operation a year prior to the story breaking and called it by name...and then under oath stated that he'd "only recently heard of it".
Naaaaa, no obvious bullshit in that.
Unlike the Obamaphile American press that has been active in sanitizing everything Obama, at least Univision had the balls to ask Obama to his face why Holder hasn't been fired.
Then again, those Univision viewers DO care that the Obama administration's underlings supplied gangsters with weapons in their home country that resulted in over 100 dead Mexicans.
Univision just went up a rung in the credibility department.
It's been a tough week for Obama in the media.
When Letterman grabbed his balls and asked Obama what the national debt was currently....the idiot pretended not to know that it's 16 trillion +...up 7 trillion from the number he "inherited".
And then Univision hitting him with hardball questions that he isn't used to getting from the media...which he shucked and jived his way through WITHOUT giving any actual answers.
I especially enjoyed the minutes long squirming non-answer to the question,
"Why was embassy security NOT raised during Sept 11th?"
What was the answer? About a 3 minutes long rambling the contained everything...except of course an answer to the question!
In fact, he sounded much like the miss teen USA contestant from last year...
Yeah...pretty much the same answer with the same amount of substance and relativity to the question that he was asked.
Of course you can always count on the fact that ANY question asked to Obama will have him spinning so many circles of bullshit that the press just gives up on hoping for an answer and moves on to an easier question...like "Who's your favorite superhero?"...which he CAN actually answer.
"Why does Eric Holder still have a job?"
Daaaa...errrrr....uhhhh..I believe U.S americans don't have access to maps...
No comments:
Post a Comment