Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Romney tells the truth...

Wow...! A politician that actually told the truth!

47% of the people will vote for Obama...no matter how dismal a piece of shit he's turned out to be....MY translation and, I stand by it because I've already said it before.

Romney's words were right on target because Obama's base is comprised of die-hard democrats who haven't yet learned that the party is a mere hologram of what it used to be, a strong faction of communists and socialists who have never experienced those ideals personally and, the rest are shitbags who will always vote in favor of those who promise letting them continue to be worthless leaches living on the backs of the American taxpayer.

What he was saying is that he understands that he'll never get the shitbag vote because the idea of going to work is repugnant to them and, the idea of lower taxation has no effect on them anyways.
His target voters are the folks who WANT to work but, can't find it under the Obama regime's idea of government funded stagnation and poverty that's being masqueraded as "recovery" in the form of food stamps.
Promising to create jobs for the Obama supporter who never wanted one in the first place is going to fall on deaf ears...just like promising fair taxation to those who don't pay them anyways will fall on those same deaf ears.

However, those who DO want to work, might have a reason for optimism as opposed to the Obama administration's constant radio broadcasts encouraging people to get on food stamps and welfare.

Now why on Earth would a sitting president who is promising ( while NEVER delivering ) better times, EVER have his underlings paying for radio time that tells people to get on assistance?

"While we've been wrecking the economy further...get on the dole!"
Sounds optimistic doesn't it?

What other American president has EVER bought radio ads encouraging people to jump on the dependency bandwagon?

NONE of them.

10 comments:

Gallant 4 Liberty said...

I AGREE! Great post and I believe we do have a choice--economic ruin or freedon--I choose the latter.

-Sepp said...

Thanks for popping in G4L.

Like the old saying goes, if your going to rob Peter to pay Paul, you can be sure of having Paul's full support.

The same goes for the core Obama voter...they have no problem in seeing Peter robbed as long as they get the proceeds...which they believe they're entitled to have just for gracing the world with their presence.

Anonymous said...

Oopsies, you forgot to mention that almost half of those deadbeat 47% will vote Republican. You also forgot that most of those 47% receiving government relief do so in the form of Social Security.

And now that you are selling items from your farm, how much TAXES are you paying on those transactions? Hmmmmmm.....thought so. Damn those darn deadbeats!

-Sepp said...

Social security isn't "relief" to those of us who have been paying for it all of our working lives from our own pockets.

As for my farming, I haven't paid any transactional sales taxes because I haven't yet sold anything I've produced.
I HAVE however paid every penny in sales taxes on my livestock feed, farm supplies, fencing, animals, fuel, etc and, have every recipt and disposition on file.

And, as with ANY business whatever extra cost I incur, I pass it onto...ready?...YOU!
So when you dipshit liberals demand that businesses be taxed at a higher rate to make yourselves feel better, just keep that in mind when you're buying eggs, poultry, pork, beef and vegetables at the store and whining about the prices...YOU did this to yourself.

Farming is a lot of work and, if you think we do it for the sake of being a leftist charity, you're wrong.

You can beg the government to tax my produce all you want. I'll still get my due for what I put into it and, you'll pay for it because even dipshit liberals have to eat something.

Hmmmm...funny how business and trading works eh?

Or, are you under the leftist delusion that no matter how much expense leftist policies create for businesses... that we'll just eat the extra cost ourselves so you can continue to eat cheaply?

Because every libnut knows that I just go out and pick fully grown, disease-free hogs off of a tree in the yard that require no care, work or, feed, take them to the butcher who slices and dices them for free and then drive them in the free truck I have that requires no fuel or, insurance to market where liberals can bitch that they're being ripped off via high costs!

If I could sell that same hog without government involvement, it would cost that same whiney liberal about $400 for an easy 250 lbs of good meat that would last his family a year!
Now do some math...
On sale this week at Giant Eagle,
Pork with "sale" prices between $3.99 and 4.99 a pound.
Let's go with $3.50 a pound to even it out a bit.

250 lbs X $3.50 = $875

$400 bucks covers MY cost to buy raise and butcher and a few bucks for my own labor included.

Add in your government's take and you pay $875+ for something you COULD have for HALF that price!

That loud "POP" you just heard is either your bubble bursting or, the sound of your head dislodging from your ass.

But, if you're still worried that I'm not being taxed enough or, paying enough, I implore you to complain.
My price runs a paralel with my expense...as does EVERY other business!
If your stupid ass wants to pay over $800+ for food you could have for $400, it make zero difference to me...my freezer is full already.

Tax the shit out of us "deadbeat" farmers!
We'll still eat and, you'll make up the difference while struggling to pay for it.

Our property taxes rise...so does your grocery bill!

Our feed costs rise...so does your grocery bill!

More costly regulations? YOU will be buying them in the end at the checkout counter!

Like I said, MY freezer is already full and, it's the FIRST one I fill with my own products...your freezer is your problem.

Until you libs find a nutrient rich recipe for dirt or, oxygen, I say go ahead and make your own food too expensive to sustain yourselves.
Liberalism is always self-destructive and, starving yourselves to death via your own policies would be fitting.

Maybe you clowns should tell each other that "eating food is racist" to kind of speed up your own decline.

Anonymous said...

Operation "Fast and Furious," the controversial undercover operation that allowed U.S. guns to be walked into Mexico, was a "risky strategy" that did not "adequately take into account the significant danger to public safety that it created."

That was the conclusion today from the Office of the Inspector General, Department of Justice, after an investigation that spanned more than a year and a half.

The OIG investigation found that Attorney General Eric Holder was not aware of the strategy and tactics used in "Fast and Furious," and turned up no evidence that Holder or other top DOJ officials tried to cover up the operation, or mislead Congress about it. Holder was held in contempt of Congress earlier this year for allegedly withholding documents about DOJ's "Fast and Furious" investigation from congressional investigators.

Anonymous said...

And by the way, Romney WAS including recipients in his 47%; they were in fact the largest part of that group. And sales tax is different than income tax. Stop spouting off B.S. when you don't know the facts.

Anonymous said...

"transactional sales taxes"

Oh my, you are a dense one.

-Sepp said...

Fast and furious? Were you not the clown that said it didn't happen and that the entire story were "lies"?
Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

In order to pay an income tax, there would have to be "income" involved dipshit.

"how much TAXES are you paying on those transactions".

The answer will always be zero because MY expenses are passed onto YOU!

Like I said, you dipshit liberals can cry for more taxes on farmers until you're blue in the face. It won't be us who end up paying them, it will be you everytime you need to shovel some food into your face.
Thats economics. Thats how it works.
Make it more expensive for a company to do business and, those who buy the products foot the bill.
It doesent matter if it's cars or, carrots.

THAT is one of the really moronic aspects of your liberal mindset.
You clowns actually believe that you're "punishing" business by adding taxes or, red tape.

You make claims that you give a shit about the poor and middle class while at the same time screwing those same folks over under the guise of slamming businesses for an imagined "fairness".

So enlighten everyone how adding a shit ton of regulation and red tape to the cost of food...benefits the poor and middle class?

I have lower middle class folks asking to buy hogs all the time because they know that buying direct from me will put food on their plates at prices they can afford.
If they followed leftist policy, they couldn't afford it...and they know it.

I can sell you a butchered rabbit, the potatoes, carrots and onions and feed your entire family a healthy filling meal for $15 which would be fair to me for my labor and effort and fair to my customer.

Hmmm...feeding a family of 5 for $3 a head...what a bad idea!
Remove the government from it all...and it's entirely doable.

Then, we have dipshits like you who are worried that ol' farmer Sepp might not be "paying his fair share" and demand that the struggling middle class family of five should be paying $6 a head instead of $3...just to keep things "fair".

But, "fair" to whom?

To an idiot liberal, "fairness" is measured in punishment vs poorness and it doesent matter who actually ends up punished...just as long as some kind of punishment was handed out to somebody.

You've all been so "noble" in punishing the fuel companies...and then wonder why gas is stuck at $4 a gallon!
"They're just greedy" is always the canned answer you're programmed belch out.
Noooo, your president promised this to you!

So, tell us how this grand idea is helping some middle class worker afford to drive to work everyday.
Explain the benefit those folks are getting from higher fuel prices due to shitty policy?

Do the same thing to the people producing your food and see what that gets you!

I suppose it's a good idea if your goal is to create a plethora of unemployed people who can't afford fuel to get to work if they could find it and couldn't afford to eat due to having to fuel their car to get to work while being able to eat too.

I say, punish me.
Add so much red tape, taxes and regulation as your liberal wet dreams will allow you.

MY freezer is the first one I fill.
You will tax and regulate yourself into starvation.

Let's see which one of us starves first.

Tenth Generation Patriot said...

How did Jeffio get to be so damn stupid? I bet it was the liberal school system.

I have a dear old friend who thinks social security and VA benefits are government assistance, and thinks Romney just pissed away vets votes. How do really bright people think so highly of Comrade Obama? Baffling.

-Sepp said...

Glad to see you're still kickin TJ!
Hope all is well and better on the homefront!

Ol' jeffio / alpha-bat is grasping at straws as usual while sidestepping reality in favor of his estrogen infused emotions.

As for those Obama voters who are "bright people", my guess is that they're either just going to vote democrat regardless of what slobbering idiot they throw into the ring...whch is obvious already.
The rest of them are the easily fooled, the "vote your race" types in which he has 96% of and, then there are the communists / socialists who are hoping that he does what they'd thought he'd do already.

Ever notice that the Obama voters who have come out stating that they're "disappointed" with Obama because they thought he'd do more are mostly socialist or, communists?
Apparently, they're upset that he didn't pull a Castro during his first term...but, they're hoping he will in the 2nd term!